How to interpret scores
How to interpret scores
QQ uses a 0–10 score for each area (Fundamentals, Tokenomics, On-chain, TA, Macro) and a global QQ Score per project.
General reading:
| range | label | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 8,5 – 10 | very cheap | very strong on that dimension |
| 6,5 – 8,4 | cheap | solid, with some risks or unknowns |
| 3,6 – 6,4 | fair value | neutral / mixed signals |
| 1,6 – 3,5 | expensive | weak, several red flags |
| 0 – 1,5 | very expensive | very fragile / highly risky |
What “cheap / expensive” means in QQ
In QQ, “undervalued / overvalued” is not a price prediction.
It is a mismatch signal between:
- the quality scores (Fundamentals, Tokenomics, On-chain, etc.)
- and the market behaviour in the timeframe analyzed (price, volume, narrative, flows).
Examples:
- High quality, weak price → “cheap zone”
- Strong Fundamentals, Tokenomics, On-chain, but price lagging peers.
- Low quality, strong price → “expensive zone”
- Weak Fundamentals or bad Tokenomics, but big hype and strong price.
QQ highlights these mismatches so you can decide to build a strategy if you want to:
- accumulate in cheap zones, or
- take profit / reduce risk in expensive zones.